Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0357520230460050427
Journal of Radiological Science and Technology
2023 Volume.46 No. 5 p.427 ~ p.433
Comparative Analysis between Directly Measured Diameter in 2D Angiography and Cross-Sectional Area-Converted Diameter in MR Image
Lee Ki-Baek

Kim Mi-Hyeon
Abstract
This study aimed to quantitatively compare the diameters measured directly from the coronal plane or sagittal plane of 2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and the cross-sectional area-converted diameters calculated from contrast-enhanced MR (CE-MR) imaging. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 20 patients who underwent both 2D DSA and CE-MR imaging. Firstly, the venous diameters of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) and transverse sinus (TS) were directly measured from 2D DSA. Subsequently, the axial planes for SSS diameter and the sagittal plane for TS in CE-MR imaging were utilized to calculate cross-sectional area-based converted diameters. The numerical values obtained from 2D DSA and CE-MR imaging were compared pairwise at each location. For SSS, the diameter measured by 2D DSA was 27% larger than the conversion-based diameter from CE-MR imaging (9.8¡¾1.4 mm vs. 7.1¡¾1.3 mm, P<0.05). Similarly, for the right TS, the difference was 16% (8.8¡¾3.2 mm vs. 7.4¡¾2.0 mm, P<0.05), and for the left TS, the difference was 22% (8.4¡¾2.8 mm vs. 6.6¡¾1.3 mm, P<0.05). In conclusion, the diameter measured directly in conventional 2D DSA may be larger than the diameter converted based on the cross-sectional area. Therefore, when selecting the size of the stent, it is crucial to make precise determinations while keeping this fact in mind.
KEYWORD
DSA, CE-MR, Diameter Measurement, SSS, TS, Dural Venous Sinus
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information